CSS offers a number of different units for expressing length. Some have their history in typography, such as point (pt) and pica (pc), others are known from everyday use, such as centimeter (cm) and inch (in). And there is also a “magic” unit that was invented specifically for CSS: the px. Does that mean different properties need different units?em, px, pt, cm, in…
CSS offers a number of different units for expressing length. Some have their history in typography, such as point (pt) and pica (pc), others are known from everyday use, such as centimeter (cm) and inch (in). And there is also a “magic” unit that was invented specifically for CSS: the px. Does that mean different properties need different units?
No, the units have nothing to do with the properties, but everything with the output media: screen or paper.
There is no restriction on which units can be used where. If a property accepts a value in px ('margin: 5px') it also accepts a value in inches or centimeters ('margin: 1.2in; margin: 0.5cm') and vice-versa.
But in general you would use a different set of units for display on screen than for printing on paper. The following table gives the recommended use:
Style sheets for output to a screen
Recommended - em, px, %
Occasional use - ex
Not recommended - pt, cm, mm, in, pc
Style sheets for printing
Recommended - em, cm, mm, in, pt, pc, %
Occasional use - px, ex
The so-called absolute units (cm, mm, in, pt and pc) mean the same in CSS as everywhere else. A length expressed in any of these will appear as exactly that size (within the precision of the hardware and software). They are not recommended for use on screen, because screen sizes vary so much. A big screen may be 60cm (24in), a small, portable screen is maybe only 8cm. And you don't look at them from the same distance.
The em and ex units depend on the font and may be different for each element in the document. The em is simply the font size. In an element with a 2in font, 1em thus means 2in. Expressing sizes, such as margins and paddings, in em means they are related to the font size, and if the user has a big font (e.g., on a big screen) or a small font (e.g., on a handheld device), the sizes will be in proportion. Declarations such as 'text-indent: 1.5em' and 'margin: 1em' are extremely common in CSS.
The ex unit is rarely used. Its purpose is to express sizes that must be related to the x-height of a font. The x-height is, roughly, the height of lowercase letters such as a, c, m, or o. Fonts that have the same size (and thus the same em) may vary wildly in the size of their lowercase letters, and when it is important that some image, e.g., matches the x-height, the ex unit is available.
The px unit is the magic unit of CSS. It is not related to the current font and also not related to the absolute units. The px unit is defined to be small but visible, and such that a horizontal 1px wide line can be displayed with sharp edges (no anti-aliasing). What is sharp, small and visible depends on the device and the way it is used: do you hold it close to your eyes, like a mobile phone, at arms length, like a computer monitor, or somewhere in between, like a book? The px is thus not defined as a constant length, but as something that depends on the type of device and its typical use.
The relation between the absolute units is as follows:
1in = 2.54cm = 25.4mm = 72pt = 12pc
If you have a ruler handy you can check how precise your device is: here is a box of 1in (2.54cm) high:
To get an idea of the appearance of a px, imagine a CRT computer monitor from the 1990s: the smallest dot it can display measures about 1/100th of an inch (0.25mm) or a little more. The px unit got its name from those screen pixels.
Nowadays there are devices that could in principle display smaller sharp dots (although you might need a magnifier to see them). But documents from the last century that used px in CSS still look the same, no matter what the device. Printers, especially, can display sharp lines with much smaller details than 1px, but even on printers, a 1px line looks very much the same as it would look on a computer monitor. Devices change, but the px always has the same visual appearance.
CSS also defines that raster images (such as photos) are, by default, displayed with one image pixel mapping to 1px. Thus a photo with a 600 by 400 resolution will be 600px wide and 400px high. The pixels in the photo thus do not map to pixels of the display device (which may be very small), but map to px units. That makes it possible to exactly align images to other elements of a document, as long as you use px units in your style sheet, and not pt, cm, etc.
Use em or px for font sizes
CSS inherited the units pt (point) and pc (pica) from typography. Printers have traditionally used those and similar units in preference to cm or in. In CSS there is no reason to use pt, use whichever unit you prefer. But there is a good reason to use neither pt nor any other absolute unit and only use em and px.
The magic unit of CSS, the px, is a often a good unit to use, especially if the style requires alignment of text to images, or simply because anything that is 1px or a multiple of 1px wide is guaranteed to look sharp.
But for font sizes it is even better to use em. The idea is (1) to not set the font size of the BODY element (in HTML), but use the default size of the device, because that is a size that the reader can comfortably read; and (2) express font sizes of other elements in em: 'H1 {font-size: 2.5em}' to make the H1 2½ times as big as the normal, body font.
The only place where you could use pt (or cm or in) for setting a font size is in style sheets for print, if you need to be sure the printed font is exactly a certain size. But even there using the default font size is usually better.
Here are a few lines of different thickness. Some or all of them may look sharp, but at least the 1px and 2px lines should be sharp and visible:
0.5pt, 1px, 1pt, 1.5px, 2px
If the first four lines all look the same (or if the 0.5pt line is missing), you are probably looking at a computer monitor that cannot display dots smaller than 1px. If the lines appear to increase in thickness, you are probably looking at this page on a high-quality computer screen or on paper. And if 1pt looks thicker than 1.5px, you probably have a handheld screen.
More units in CSS in the future
To make it even easier to make style rules that depend only on the default font size, a new unit is in development: the rem. The rem (for “root em”) is the font size of the root element of the document. Unlike the em, which may be different for each element, the rem is constant throughout the document.
Other units in development make it possible to specify sizes relative to the reader's window. These are the vw and vh. The vw is 1/100th of the window's width and the vh is 1/100th of the window's height.
Article Source : http://www.w3.org/Style/Examples/007/units
CSS offers a number of different units for expressing length. Some have their history in typography, such as point (pt) and pica (pc), others are known from everyday use, such as centimeter (cm) and inch (in). And there is also a “magic” unit that was invented specifically for CSS: the px. Does that mean different properties need different units?
No, the units have nothing to do with the properties, but everything with the output media: screen or paper.
There is no restriction on which units can be used where. If a property accepts a value in px ('margin: 5px') it also accepts a value in inches or centimeters ('margin: 1.2in; margin: 0.5cm') and vice-versa.
But in general you would use a different set of units for display on screen than for printing on paper. The following table gives the recommended use:
Style sheets for output to a screen
Recommended - em, px, %
Occasional use - ex
Not recommended - pt, cm, mm, in, pc
Style sheets for printing
Recommended - em, cm, mm, in, pt, pc, %
Occasional use - px, ex
The so-called absolute units (cm, mm, in, pt and pc) mean the same in CSS as everywhere else. A length expressed in any of these will appear as exactly that size (within the precision of the hardware and software). They are not recommended for use on screen, because screen sizes vary so much. A big screen may be 60cm (24in), a small, portable screen is maybe only 8cm. And you don't look at them from the same distance.
The em and ex units depend on the font and may be different for each element in the document. The em is simply the font size. In an element with a 2in font, 1em thus means 2in. Expressing sizes, such as margins and paddings, in em means they are related to the font size, and if the user has a big font (e.g., on a big screen) or a small font (e.g., on a handheld device), the sizes will be in proportion. Declarations such as 'text-indent: 1.5em' and 'margin: 1em' are extremely common in CSS.
The ex unit is rarely used. Its purpose is to express sizes that must be related to the x-height of a font. The x-height is, roughly, the height of lowercase letters such as a, c, m, or o. Fonts that have the same size (and thus the same em) may vary wildly in the size of their lowercase letters, and when it is important that some image, e.g., matches the x-height, the ex unit is available.
The px unit is the magic unit of CSS. It is not related to the current font and also not related to the absolute units. The px unit is defined to be small but visible, and such that a horizontal 1px wide line can be displayed with sharp edges (no anti-aliasing). What is sharp, small and visible depends on the device and the way it is used: do you hold it close to your eyes, like a mobile phone, at arms length, like a computer monitor, or somewhere in between, like a book? The px is thus not defined as a constant length, but as something that depends on the type of device and its typical use.
The relation between the absolute units is as follows:
1in = 2.54cm = 25.4mm = 72pt = 12pc
If you have a ruler handy you can check how precise your device is: here is a box of 1in (2.54cm) high:
To get an idea of the appearance of a px, imagine a CRT computer monitor from the 1990s: the smallest dot it can display measures about 1/100th of an inch (0.25mm) or a little more. The px unit got its name from those screen pixels.
Nowadays there are devices that could in principle display smaller sharp dots (although you might need a magnifier to see them). But documents from the last century that used px in CSS still look the same, no matter what the device. Printers, especially, can display sharp lines with much smaller details than 1px, but even on printers, a 1px line looks very much the same as it would look on a computer monitor. Devices change, but the px always has the same visual appearance.
CSS also defines that raster images (such as photos) are, by default, displayed with one image pixel mapping to 1px. Thus a photo with a 600 by 400 resolution will be 600px wide and 400px high. The pixels in the photo thus do not map to pixels of the display device (which may be very small), but map to px units. That makes it possible to exactly align images to other elements of a document, as long as you use px units in your style sheet, and not pt, cm, etc.
Use em or px for font sizes
CSS inherited the units pt (point) and pc (pica) from typography. Printers have traditionally used those and similar units in preference to cm or in. In CSS there is no reason to use pt, use whichever unit you prefer. But there is a good reason to use neither pt nor any other absolute unit and only use em and px.
The magic unit of CSS, the px, is a often a good unit to use, especially if the style requires alignment of text to images, or simply because anything that is 1px or a multiple of 1px wide is guaranteed to look sharp.
But for font sizes it is even better to use em. The idea is (1) to not set the font size of the BODY element (in HTML), but use the default size of the device, because that is a size that the reader can comfortably read; and (2) express font sizes of other elements in em: 'H1 {font-size: 2.5em}' to make the H1 2½ times as big as the normal, body font.
The only place where you could use pt (or cm or in) for setting a font size is in style sheets for print, if you need to be sure the printed font is exactly a certain size. But even there using the default font size is usually better.
Here are a few lines of different thickness. Some or all of them may look sharp, but at least the 1px and 2px lines should be sharp and visible:
0.5pt, 1px, 1pt, 1.5px, 2px
If the first four lines all look the same (or if the 0.5pt line is missing), you are probably looking at a computer monitor that cannot display dots smaller than 1px. If the lines appear to increase in thickness, you are probably looking at this page on a high-quality computer screen or on paper. And if 1pt looks thicker than 1.5px, you probably have a handheld screen.
More units in CSS in the future
To make it even easier to make style rules that depend only on the default font size, a new unit is in development: the rem. The rem (for “root em”) is the font size of the root element of the document. Unlike the em, which may be different for each element, the rem is constant throughout the document.
Other units in development make it possible to specify sizes relative to the reader's window. These are the vw and vh. The vw is 1/100th of the window's width and the vh is 1/100th of the window's height.
Article Source : http://www.w3.org/Style/Examples/007/units
